"*" indicates required fields

Subscribe

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy

Subscription Settings
Analysis

Talk of the Day in Iran: The Nuclear Bomb

The April 26 edition of the Iran Media Review highlights the debate over the possibility of Iran changing its nuclear policy amid rising tensions with Israel.

Ali Alfoneh

4 min read

As Israel debated its response to Iran’s April 13 drone and missile attacks, Brigadier General Ahmad Haqtalab, who is responsible for the security of Iran’s nuclear installations, warned Tehran would “reconsider its nuclear doctrine and policies” if Israel targeted its nuclear infrastructure. This warning was followed by similar statements from a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee. While the former statement was quoted but not debated in Iran’s state-censored media, the latter provoked a national debate on the wisdom of publicly commenting on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

  • April 18: Serat News, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps mouthpiece, quoted Haqtalab as warning that Iran would “reconsider its nuclear doctrine and policies” should Israel attack Iranian nuclear infrastructure. He further suggested that if Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was attacked, it is “likely and conceivable” Iran would “deviate from previously stated positions,” possibly referencing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s highly publicized fatwa, or religious edict, prohibiting the production and use of nuclear weapons.
  • April 22: Javad Karimi Qodousi, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, commented on the subject on X, formerly known as Twitter: “It will only take a week from the time permission is given until the first test is conducted,” alluding to the potential for nuclear testing.
  • April 24: Centrist Farda News condemned Qodousi’s statements, which, according to the news agency, “undermine” Iran’s national security: “When the West, led by the Zionist regime and the United States, is trying to create an international consensus against Iran, why is a member of the National Security Committee trying to help the enemy with his statements? How can the Foreign Ministry explain to the world that this individual was expressing his personal viewpoints and not the official position of the Islamic Republic of Iran? Zionist media is now constantly reporting that Iran’s missile program is a threat to world security. It is also giving vast coverage to Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who has repeated his old claim that Iran is just a few weeks away from the nuclear bomb. Iran, on the other hand, is trying to prove that Israel is disturbing the regional order and security and not the Islamic Republic of Iran. Under such circumstances, Qodousi’s tweet does not help Iran’s national security but causes Iranophobia, the exact goal of the United States and the Zionist regime.”
  • April 24: IRGC mouthpiece Mashregh News, in an article that for the most part attacked Grossi’s statement that Iran is “just weeks, rather than months” away from obtaining enough enriched uranium to develop a nuclear bomb, made a vague reference to Qodousi’s public comments: “The truth is that Iran’s nuclear doctrine is completely clear and transparent, but Iran will use all of its capacities in the nuclear field to achieve state-of-the-art technology. Individuals expressing their personal viewpoints do not change the general direction of the regime.”

The views represented herein are the author's or speaker's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AGSI, its staff, or its board of directors.

Ali Alfoneh

Senior Fellow, AGSI

Analysis

Iran’s Strategic Dilemma: Capitulation or Parity?

The current cease-fire may just be an interregnum between rounds of conflict between Israel and Iran, as Iranian decision makers appear more inclined to pursue strategic parity than capitulate.

Ali Alfoneh

7 min read

Iran's army commander-in-chief General Amir Hatami attends a video call with top commanders in Zolfaghar central headquarters, Iran, June 23. (Iranian Army Press Service via AP)

The United States on the Verge of Another “Forever War”?

U.S. entry in the air war on Israel’s side could have seriously destabilizing consequences in the broader Gulf region unless the war ends quickly.

Ali Alfoneh

4 min read

Smoke rises from the building of Iran's state-run television after an Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, June 16. (AP Photo)

Iran Is Attacked, the Gulf Reacts

AGSI explains what Israel’s sudden and massive attack on Iran is likely to mean for Gulf Arab states, Iran, the United States, and global and regional economies.

34 min read

Smoke rises after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Friday, June 13. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

A Path to a Stronger United States in the Gulf

AGSI offers pragmatic, targeted policy recommendations for the Trump administration to maximize U.S. political and economic influence with the crucial emerging regional powers in the Gulf.

20 min read

President Donald J. Trump, fifth left, attends a group photo session with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, fourth right, UAE Crown Prince Khaled bin Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, second right, Bahraini Crown Prince and Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad al-Khalifa, left, Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, third left, Kuwaiti Emir Meshal al-Ahmed al-Jaber al-Sabah, second left, GCC Secretary-General Jasem Albudaiwi, right, during the GCC Summit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 14. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
View All

Events

Jun 23, 2025

U.S. Strike on Iran: Regional and Diplomatic Fallout

On June 23, AGSI hosted a discussion on the United States' attack on Iranian nuclear sites.

President Donald J. Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington, June 21, after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites, as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP)
President Donald J. Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington, June 21, after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites, as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP)

Jun 16, 2025

Assessing Iranian, U.S., and Gulf Reactions and Options Following Israel’s Unprecedented Attack on Iran

On June 16, AGSI hosted a discussion on Israel's attack on Iran.

Rescuers work at the scene of a damaged building in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA via REUTERS)
Rescuers work at the scene of a damaged building in the aftermath of Israeli strikes in Tehran, Iran, June 13. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA via REUTERS)

Apr 29, 2025

The Real Deal? Are Washington and Tehran Closer to a Compromise?

On April 29, AGSI hosted a discussion on the U.S.-Iranian nuclear negotiations.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, left, meets his Omani counterpart Sayyid Badr Al Busaidi prior to negotiations with Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff in Muscat, Oman, Saturday, April 12. (Iranian Foreign Ministry via AP)
In this photo released by Iranian Foreign Ministry, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, left, meets his Omani counterpart Sayyid Badr Albusaidi prior to negotiations with U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff in Muscat, Oman, Saturday, April 12, 2025. (Iranian Foreign Ministry via AP)

Jul 11, 2024

In Conversation With Ali Alfoneh: Does Iran’s Presidential Election Matter?

On July 11, AGSIW hosted a discussion on Iran's presidential election.

People watch the debate of presidential candidates at a park in Tehran, Iran July 1, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/ West Asia News Agency via REUTERS)
People watch the debate of presidential candidates at a park in Tehran, Iran July 1, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/ West Asia News Agency via REUTERS)
View All