"*" indicates required fields

Subscribe

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy

Subscription Settings
Analysis

Khamenei on Syria: Defiance in Defeat

The December 13 edition of the Iran Media Review explores the Iranian supreme leader’s first public statement in the wake of the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria. 

Ali Alfoneh

4 min read

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei showed defiance in defeat in his first public statement in the wake of the collapse of the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Indirectly, he accused the new rulers of Syria of being agents of the United States and Israel. Furthermore, he claimed Iran was willing to but incapable of airlifting troops to Syria due to the United States and Israel closing the skies over Syria to Iranian airplanes. But he added that Assad had not requested military assistance from Iran. He spoke extensively about the invulnerability of the “axis of resistance,” his term for what remains of Iran’s proxies, despite the collapse of the Assad regime. However, his final warnings against those who try to “demoralize” the Iranian public prove what is evident for all to see: The Assad regime’s collapse was Iran’s defeat, compounding Hezbollah’s failure in Lebanon.  

  • December 11: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei addressed the Iranian public following the overthrow of the Assad regime in remarks transcribed on his website: 
    • “First and foremost, let there be no doubt that what happened in Syria was the result of a joint American and Zionist plot. Yes, a neighboring state of Syria,” a likely reference to Turkey, “played a role evident to all and is still playing this role. This is visible for all to see, but they,” a reference to the United States and Israel, “are the principal actors, the chief architects, and the ultimate strategists. The command-and-control center is located in America or within the Zionist regime. There is evidence that unequivocally points to this reality. One of the indicators is their conduct in this matter. In a state, even one governed by a regime you do not agree with, entangled in a conflict where two factions vie for dominance, why intervene? Reportedly, the Zionist regime has targeted 300 locations in Syria. Why? If you are not complicit in this conflict and if you claim neutrality, why engage militarily? Why intervene with airstrikes on over three hundred sites? Meanwhile, the Americans announced, as of yesterday – a figure that may have increased since – that they have struck 75 targets, many of which include Syria’s critical infrastructure. These are facilities not easily rebuilt: airports, research centers, and the like. Why did the Zionist regime and the United States escalate their involvement by targeting this sovereign state? Bombing 300-400 locations is no trivial matter. Separately, the Zionist regime has also encroached upon Syrian territorial integrity, with their tanks advancing perilously close to Damascus. The occupied Golan Heights has long been in their hands, and now they are seizing additional territories. The United States, Europe, and other governments, which are usually vocal about territorial breaches – even of mere meters – have not only remained silent but have actively supported Israel, making them equally culpable.” 
    • He continued that, toward the end of the Assad regime, there was evidence that “urgently required” Iranian humanitarian aid as well as “personnel, forces, and other resources were meant to be deployed there, but Zionist and American aircraft imposed a de facto blockade. F-15 fighter jets patrolled the skies, obstructing all passage. Despite this, one of our pilots demonstrated exceptional valor, risking his life to land in Damascus. However, greater efforts were needed, but they were systematically thwarted. Well, if you are not involved in this conflict and claim to be combating specific terrorist or armed groups, why engage in these obstructive actions? Why intervene, aid the opposition, and prevent assistance to the Syrian populace?” 
    • “The axis of resistance is not a tangible entity that can be dismantled or obliterated. Resistance is a conviction, an ideology, a commitment rooted in faith, and an intellectual paradigm. The motivation of the axis’ members only strengthens when confronted with malevolence, and its scope will continue to expand. Witnessing the enemy’s brutality reinforces the resolve of those who were previously hesitant, proving that resistance is the sole viable path against oppression. This is the essence of resistance.”

The views represented herein are the author's or speaker's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AGSI, its staff, or its board of directors.

Ali Alfoneh

Senior Fellow, AGSI

Analysis

Araghchi: U.S. and Iran Agree on Continued Talks

The May 13 edition of the Iran Media Review evaluates remarks by the Iranian foreign minister and state-controlled media endorsing continued U.S.-Iran negotiations.

Ali Alfoneh

9 min read

Araghchi: U.S. and Iran Agree on Continued Talks

The Use of Force and the Trajectory of U.S.-Iran Talks

The May 9 edition of the Iran Media Review examines disagreements among Iranian media outlets about the effect of a Houthi missile strike targeting Israel on U.S.-Iranian negotiations.

Ali Alfoneh

6 min read

The Use of Force and the Trajectory of U.S.-Iran Talks

Nour News on Postponement of Talks: “Neither a Dead End, nor Complete Progress”

The May 6 edition of the Iran Media Review highlights Iranian media analysis about the postponement of U.S.-Iran negotiations.

Ali Alfoneh

4 min read

Nour News on Postponement of Talks: “Neither a Dead End, nor Complete Progress”

All Roads Lead Away From Rome?

The May 2 edition of the Iran Media Review considers a report by an Iranian news agency following the postponement of the fourth round of U.S.-Iran talks.

Ali Alfoneh

3 min read

All Roads Lead Away From Rome?
View All

Events

Apr 29, 2025

The Real Deal? Are Washington and Tehran Closer to a Compromise?

On April 29, AGSI hosted a discussion on the U.S.-Iranian nuclear negotiations.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, left, meets his Omani counterpart Sayyid Badr Al Busaidi prior to negotiations with Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff in Muscat, Oman, Saturday, April 12. (Iranian Foreign Ministry via AP)
In this photo released by Iranian Foreign Ministry, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, left, meets his Omani counterpart Sayyid Badr Albusaidi prior to negotiations with U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff in Muscat, Oman, Saturday, April 12, 2025. (Iranian Foreign Ministry via AP)

Jul 11, 2024

In Conversation With Ali Alfoneh: Does Iran’s Presidential Election Matter?

On July 11, AGSIW hosted a discussion on Iran's presidential election.

People watch the debate of presidential candidates at a park in Tehran, Iran July 1, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/ West Asia News Agency via REUTERS)
People watch the debate of presidential candidates at a park in Tehran, Iran July 1, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/ West Asia News Agency via REUTERS)

Jan 9, 2024

2024 Outlook

On January 9, AGSIW hosted a virtual roundtable with its leadership and scholars as they looked ahead and assessed trends likely to shape the Gulf region and U.S. foreign policy during the coming year.

Oct 12, 2023

Will the Israel-Hamas Conflict Spell the End of Regional Reconciliation?

On October 12, AGSIW hosted a discussion on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Smoke billows following Israeli strikes, in Gaza City, October 11. (REUTERS/Mohammed Salem)
Smoke billows following Israeli strikes, in Gaza City, October 11. (REUTERS/Mohammed Salem)
View All